NVIDIA: Hard growth, costs on the balance sheet
FY27 Q2 revenue of $96.2B and Data Center growth of +117% settle the demand debate; the dispute is gross-margin path, $279B supply commitments and $108.5B guarantees.
Read the research →CANONICAL RESEARCH / LUNARTULIP DEEP DIVE
COMPANY DEEP DIVES / 07
Each object fixes its as-of date, Claim IDs, Evidence Ledger, valuation scenarios and forward falsifiers. New evidence advances the version without overwriting the original information set.
FY27 Q2 revenue of $96.2B and Data Center growth of +117% settle the demand debate; the dispute is gross-margin path, $279B supply commitments and $108.5B guarantees.
Read the research →Three quarters of accelerating product revenue near +37% is verifiable; the half-from-AI line is management attribution only.
Read the research →The 1,700% figure establishes that the traffic arrived. It says nothing about revenue per machine action: Cloudflare discloses no attributable revenue, no paid-request mix and no cross-product attach rate. The variable to underwrite is monetization density.
Read the research →FY2026 revenue grew 26%; subscription ARR grew 23%. That gap is worth interrogating. Collaboration software has always billed headcount, and AI coding compresses headcount while manufacturing work state.
Read the research →Commercial revenue, TCV and margin accelerated together in Q2, and that much is settled. What still needs proving is where the money sits. Innovation budgets get cut in a downturn. Operating budgets get defended.
Read the research →Near-term price and allocation dynamics can still deliver, but the variable that decides whether the cycle is broken is not the next print. It is what happens to price, margin and commodity linkage once capex becomes qualified supply.
Read the research →Contracting is already visible on the balance sheet, but the floor has not been stress-tested through oversupply. The gap between reported and adjusted free cash flow is the first bridge in judging whether the annuity narrative can hold.
Read the research →THEME STUDIES / 03
Theme Studies test one shared question across companies, using control cases to distinguish industry narrative from attributable economic value.
Demand, pricing, yield and capacity are already crowded debates. The more testable expectations gap is whether product-revenue growth still leaves repeatable cash after customer funding, joint-venture contributions and new capacity investment.
Read the theme study →The second derivative of spot is rising while the second derivative of contract prices is falling. Structural memory profit lands first with the constraint owners, NAND amplifies the cycle, and the Chinese module makers amplify inventory timing. In optics the reported numbers are still strong and the margin for error has thinned. The tidy version — memory takes the baton, optics hands it over — is not what the global reporting season produced.
Read the theme study →PLTR, NET and TEAM sit at three points on the same path: budget confirmed, billing unit unproven, billing basis itself in question. DDOG and APP serve as controls, showing what completed transmission looks like in the financials.
Read the theme study →Use these Deep Dives to evaluate Lunartulip’s work on companies, industry transmission, expectation gaps and risk boundaries. Point-in-time context and later corrections help separate the original information set and thesis from evidence that emerged afterward.
AlphaMap starts from industry causality, value transmission and critical connections. Its public, falsifiable research maps remain separate from the company and theme cards on this page.
Explore AlphaMap →FROM PUBLIC PROOF TO CONTINUOUS RESEARCH
Public Deep Dives are the citable proof surface. Continuous research, machine-readable interfaces and research data are scoped by coverage, use and licensing.
Continuous research, state changes and validation points for professional investors and institutions.
Explore Research Desk →Six working sessions to install an existing research method as an operating system.
Explore the workshop →Bring point-in-time Research Objects, claims, evidence and state data into internal systems.
Discuss machine-readable delivery →